Writing for the Word

Wordsmithy | Why Christians must write, and what they must write about | Doug Wilson from Daniel Foucachon on Vimeo.

Acres of Literature or Mark Twain on Being a Printer

One isn't a printer ten years without setting up acres of good and bad literature and learning, unconsciously at first, consciously later, [and] to discriminate between the two and meanwhile consciously acquiring what is called a style ("The Turning Point of My Life").

Delivering the Good Thesis Pt 2

The introductory paragraph should not only state the thesis but explain how you are going to prove it. This includes method as well as lines of evidence.

Delivering the Good Thesis

This is my Tenth year of teaching, and I've read a lot of thesis papers and tried to teach students how to write them. So this is my moment of frustrated clarity on what a good thesis paper should look like. The thesis must be stated in the introduction, argued and defended in the body, and restated and reviewed in the conclusion.

A proper thesis paper must rehearse a controversy or disputed issue, take a position, and state it as the thesis. This all happens in the introductory paragraph and should hit the supporting arguments like a preview for an action movie. Grab the reader by the throat, strap on his seatbelt, slap his bare cheeks with aftershave, cast a spell, I don't care, but get us into the heat of the controversy immediately. Nobody wants to go around the block before they cross the street or on a journey of knowledge Captain Quidnunc.

The thesis paper must distinguish primary and secondary sources!

The thesis must be argue against at least one opposing position in the secondary literature. It must show support from primary sources and interpretations from expert scholars in the secondary sources. This is to say that the thesis must engage the scholarly world and not be written in a hermetically sealed universe of its own pretense. This prevents the paper from sounding like an encyclopedia article, report, or, worst of all, a personal reflection.

A professor friend of mine told me recently that "Jesus does not make good cameos." I laughed my head off! I don't know how many times I've been reading a well intentioned student who inserts his Christian point of view, saying we all know that a certain philosophy is wrong because the Bible says so, and Jesus will prove it when he returns, and I will have won the argument. This comes across as hubris to those who are on the outside looking in, and is usually an unwarranted appeal to authority. If the philosophy is wrong, then Jesus has probably left evidence and arguments in his world to prove it wrong, so that we don't have to invoke his name like it's a heavenly sledgehammer.

We don't always need to argue from a Christian point of view. Sometimes we argue merely from the nature of the research to a conclusion that any human being can understand. If it is done well, it will be compatible with the Christian worldview, and we won't have to get preachy. If we are arguing from an explicitly Christian point of view, then all we need to do is write: "From a Christian point of view ...."

A thesis paper must also restate the thesis in the conclusion and remind the reader of the points scored like the sports reel on ESPN. The introduction is the movie preview and the conclusion is the highlight reel and the body links the two by "delivering the goods."

We Become What We Study

This was my conversion to the baroque. Here under that high and insolent dome, under those tricky ceilings; here, as I passed through those arches and broken pediments to the pillared shade beyond and sat, hour by hour, before the fountain, probing its shadows, tracing its lingering echoes, rejoicing in all its clustered feats of daring and invention, I felt a whole new system of nerves alive within me, as though the water that spurted and bubbled among its stones was indeed a life-giving spring.

Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited

A Monologue on Conversation

We need good conversation. We are verbal creations, actually verbalized into existence and fashioned in the image of the Word. To be good conversationalists we need to be good listeners, thinkers, and speakers. Most of all we want our rhetoric to be memorable.

Conversation, as I know it, is like juggling; up go the balls and the balloons and the plates, up and over, in and out spinning and leaping, good solid objects that glitter in the footlights and fall with a bang if you miss them. But when dear Sebastian speaks it is like a little sphere of soapsuds drifting off the end of old clay pipes anywhere, full of rainbow light for a second and then--phut!--vanished, with nothing at all, nothing.

Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited

Conversing well means using vivid images, metaphors, and turns of phrase. We also need fidelity to truth if we want to resonate with our discussion partners. There is nothing more tiring than listening to bubbles. It is also desirable to leave silence and not go on endlessly bubbling. Our contributions should be more like popcorn and less like posing.

Does anyone desire to turn this monologue into a cybersation?

"To thin to plow"

Twain loved the Mississippi, except when it came through a faucet. The drinking water in St. Louis was, he wrote, “too thick to drink and too thin to plow…. It comes out of the turbulent bank-caving Missouri, and every tumblerful of it holds nearly an acre of land in solution.” Such richness had undoubtedly played a large part in giving St. Louis its taste for beer.

William Everdell The First Moderns, 209.